Robot Operating Systems: ROS 2 vs Proprietary Platforms
Autonomous Robotics

Robot Operating Systems: ROS 2 vs Proprietary Platforms

01 April 2026
78 Views
5 min read
The choice of robot operating system is a crucial decision for businesses and developers looking to deploy autonomous robots. In this article, we will explore the differences between ROS 2 and proprietary platforms, and discuss the benefits and drawbacks of each. We will also examine how QubitPage's CarphaCom Robotised platform is leveraging NVIDIA technology to deliver cutting-edge autonomous robotics solutions.

Introduction to Robot Operating Systems

Robot operating systems (ROS) are software frameworks that enable developers to build and deploy autonomous robots. They provide a set of tools and libraries that simplify the development process, allowing developers to focus on creating applications and functionality rather than building the underlying infrastructure. ROS has become a widely-used standard in the robotics industry, with many companies and organizations adopting it as their platform of choice.

However, not all ROS platforms are created equal. The original ROS (now known as ROS 1) has been largely superseded by ROS 2, which offers improved performance, security, and scalability. Meanwhile, proprietary platforms have emerged as alternatives to ROS, offering customised solutions tailored to specific use cases and applications.

ROS 2: The Open-Source Standard

ROS 2 is the latest iteration of the Robot Operating System, designed to provide a more robust and scalable platform for building autonomous robots. It offers a number of improvements over ROS 1, including:

  • Improved performance: ROS 2 is designed to handle larger and more complex systems, making it ideal for applications that require high levels of autonomy and decision-making.
  • Enhanced security: ROS 2 includes a number of security features, such as encryption and access control, to protect against potential threats and vulnerabilities.
  • Increased scalability: ROS 2 is designed to handle large-scale systems, making it ideal for applications that require multiple robots and sensors.

ROS 2 is widely used in the robotics industry, with many companies and organizations adopting it as their platform of choice. According to a survey by the Open Robotics organisation, over 70% of robotics developers use ROS 2 as their primary platform (Source: Open Robotics, 2022).

Benefits of ROS 2

The benefits of ROS 2 are numerous. It provides a large community of developers and users, which can be a significant advantage when it comes to troubleshooting and finding solutions to common problems. Additionally, ROS 2 is highly customisable, allowing developers to tailor the platform to their specific needs and applications. Finally, ROS 2 is free and open-source, making it an attractive option for businesses and organisations on a budget.

Drawbacks of ROS 2

Despite its many benefits, ROS 2 is not without its drawbacks. One of the main limitations of ROS 2 is its steep learning curve, which can make it difficult for new developers to get started. Additionally, ROS 2 requires significant computational resources, which can be a challenge for applications that require low-power or low-cost solutions. Finally, ROS 2 is not as widely supported as some proprietary platforms, which can make it difficult to find compatible hardware and software components.

Proprietary Platforms: Customised Solutions

Proprietary platforms, on the other hand, offer customised solutions tailored to specific use cases and applications. These platforms are often developed by companies that specialise in robotics and autonomous systems, and are designed to provide a more streamlined and integrated experience. Proprietary platforms can offer a number of benefits, including:

  • Improved performance: Proprietary platforms are often optimised for specific hardware and software configurations, which can result in improved performance and efficiency.
  • Enhanced security: Proprietary platforms often include customised security features and protocols, which can provide an additional layer of protection against potential threats and vulnerabilities.
  • Simplified development: Proprietary platforms often provide a more streamlined and integrated development experience, which can simplify the process of building and deploying autonomous robots.

However, proprietary platforms also have their drawbacks. One of the main limitations is limited customisation, which can make it difficult for developers to tailor the platform to their specific needs and applications. Additionally, proprietary platforms are often more expensive than ROS 2, which can be a challenge for businesses and organisations on a budget. Finally, proprietary platforms may not be as widely supported as ROS 2, which can make it difficult to find compatible hardware and software components.

Examples of Proprietary Platforms

There are a number of proprietary platforms available, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. For example, NVIDIA's Isaac is a proprietary platform that provides a comprehensive suite of tools and libraries for building autonomous robots. QubitPage's CarphaCom Robotised is another example of a proprietary platform, which leverages NVIDIA's Isaac Sim and Jetson to deliver cutting-edge autonomous robotics solutions for warehouse logistics, agriculture, military, and home assistance. According to a report by MarketsandMarkets, the global autonomous robotics market is expected to reach $12.3 billion by 2025, with proprietary platforms playing a significant role in driving this growth (Source: MarketsandMarkets, 2022).

Comparison of ROS 2 and Proprietary Platforms

So how do ROS 2 and proprietary platforms compare? The answer depends on the specific needs and requirements of the application. ROS 2 is a good choice for applications that require:

  • High levels of autonomy: ROS 2 is designed to handle complex and dynamic systems, making it ideal for applications that require high levels of autonomy and decision-making.
  • Customisation and flexibility: ROS 2 is highly customisable, making it ideal for applications that require tailored solutions and configurations.
  • Low cost: ROS 2 is free and open-source, making it an attractive option for businesses and organisations on a budget.

On the other hand, proprietary platforms are a good choice for applications that require:

  • Improved performance: Proprietary platforms are often optimised for specific hardware and software configurations, which can result in improved performance and efficiency.
  • Enhanced security: Proprietary platforms often include customised security features and protocols, which can provide an additional layer of protection against potential threats and vulnerabilities.
  • Simplified development: Proprietary platforms often provide a more streamlined and integrated development experience, which can simplify the process of building and deploying autonomous robots.

NVIDIA GTC 2026: Cutting-Edge Developments in Autonomous Robotics

The NVIDIA GTC 2026 conference, which will take place in San Jose from March 16-19, is expected to showcase a number of cutting-edge developments in autonomous robotics. As an NVIDIA Premier Showcase partner, QubitPage will be demonstrating its CarphaCom Robotised platform, which leverages NVIDIA's Isaac Sim and Jetson to deliver autonomous robotics solutions for a range of applications. According to a report by NVIDIA, the use of AI and robotics in industries such as manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare is expected to drive significant growth and innovation in the coming years (Source: NVIDIA, 2022).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the choice of robot operating system is a crucial decision for businesses and developers looking to deploy autonomous robots. ROS 2 and proprietary platforms each have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the application. By understanding the benefits and drawbacks of each platform, developers can make informed decisions and choose the platform that best meets their needs. For more information on QubitPage's CarphaCom Robotised platform and how it can help you deliver cutting-edge autonomous robotics solutions, please visit qubitpage.com.

As the autonomous robotics industry continues to evolve and grow, it is likely that we will see further developments and innovations in robot operating systems. The use of AI and robotics in industries such as manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare is expected to drive significant growth and innovation in the coming years, and the choice of robot operating system will play a critical role in determining the success of these applications. By staying up-to-date with the latest developments and advancements in autonomous robotics, businesses and developers can stay ahead of the curve and deliver cutting-edge solutions that meet the needs of their customers and users.

Related Articles